<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>MicheBelz Hollywood &#187; Entertainment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/category/uncategorized/entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com</link>
	<description>All about Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2014 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>michebelzhollywood@gmail.com (MicheBel)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>michebelzhollywood@gmail.com (MicheBel)</webMaster>
	<category>entertainment</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Miche reviews movies and TV shows and other pop culture items. She also predicts Oscars and Emmys and other fun things.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>Oscars, Emmys, movies, TV, reviews, film, music</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Music" />
	<itunes:category text="TV &#38; Film" />
	<itunes:category text="Arts">
		<itunes:category text="Performing Arts" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>MicheBel</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>MicheBel</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>michebelzhollywood@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Kissing Does Not Make You a Slut, and Other Bachelor Conundrums</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2012/01/kissing-does-not-make-you-a-slut-and-other-bachelor-conundrums/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2012/01/kissing-does-not-make-you-a-slut-and-other-bachelor-conundrums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MicheBel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bachelor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Flajnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fireworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kissing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tantra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kissing. Lips to lips. Maybe some tongue. Maybe even more tongue. Ah, kissing. What a wonderful thing (though I only vaguely remember it these days&#8230;). Still, people have been getting just UP IN ARMS about rampant kissing. (Personally, I think &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2012/01/kissing-does-not-make-you-a-slut-and-other-bachelor-conundrums/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kissing.</p>
<p>Lips to lips. Maybe some tongue. Maybe even more tongue.</p>
<p>Ah, kissing.</p>
<p>What a wonderful thing (though I only vaguely remember it these days&#8230;).</p>
<p>Still, people have been getting just UP IN ARMS about rampant kissing. (Personally, I think you can NEVER Kiss or Hug people enough.)</p>
<p>But on this show called The Bachelor, folks are just crazy about it. The word that they use to describe our Bachelor Ben, who has been doing a LOT of kissing, and it&#8217;s only Episode 3 of this season is &#8220;Slut.&#8221; (They do this nonsense on The Bachelorette, too, though girls don&#8217;t usually do the rampant kissing until much later in the season.)</p>
<p>I have a lot of opinions about this, mostly along the lines of &#8220;Oh America, you are so prudish, get over your damn selves,&#8221; variety. Mostly they are these, though.</p>
<p>First of all, both The Bachelor and The Bachelorette are silly shows. Totally silly. They were classy and fun at the beginning, but now they are just silly. Example: on tonight&#8217;s show (which I watch, live blog and actually pick up followers on Twitter when I do. Sigh.) they had these girls IN BIKINIS skiiing down a hill in San Francisco. (Don&#8217;t ask.)</p>
<p>It used to be a show about discovering each other, and who you like and maybe falling in love, and now it&#8217;s all obstacle courses and nonsense. Still, I watch.</p>
<p>So, for the record, I am vehemently and absolutely against all the crap that wouldn&#8217;t happen on a normal date. Like skiing in San Francisco. *eyeroll* In BIKINIS. *double eyeroll* Or, the other Bachelor de rigueur item, for whatever reason (can I PLEASE shoot the producer who thought up this pathetic crap?), they take whoever it is over some ridiculously high place, and have them &#8220;conquer their fears&#8221; together. Tonight (it was a stupidity double-feature on this episode), they had the two prospective lovers climbing up the San Francisco bridge.</p>
<p>NONSENSE. Stuff and nonsense and stupidity.</p>
<p>But I, who am spoiled on Survivor, where you actually have REAL moments and unscripted TV in a reality show, live for the REAL moments. So yeah, it was kinda cool when poor Emily is scared out of her bloody wits, and can&#8217;t walk up this stupid bridge one step further, and Ben kisses her. That was kinda cool.</p>
<p>Which brings me again to my point.</p>
<p>Kissing.</p>
<p>Kissing smooths out many a rough spot on the rocky road to a relationship. Furthermore, if I were faced (God help me) with a choice of roughly 30 hot hunks to choose from, hopefully to pick my husband from among them (OK, that would never happen, and if it did, I&#8217;d make the producers go back to square one about 80 times when they keep bringing in these model and actor types, instead of real men. So, OK, I could never actually be on this show.)&#8230;but let&#8217;s just say hypothetically&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m on the show. I must pick from these assembled 30 guys. There is only so much surface judgment one can do. Everyone looks good at the beginning, especially the way they are all trussed up like prize pigs in front of you. So how do you decide?</p>
<p>On Disney-owned ABC, during prime time? The only thing YOU CAN do is kiss them. You can tell a lot about a person&#8217;s kiss. Both in the doing and giving of it, and the watching. Like Ben&#8217;s favorite, Courtney. She&#8217;s favored because she&#8217;s a model and is &#8220;so beautiful.&#8221; (Men are so stupid sometimes&#8230;) So is he not noticing that when he kisses her, in front of a dramatic San Francisco skyline, she&#8217;s making sure that the camera has her best side? (Instead of, you know, KISSING HIM?)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually of the opinion that you can tell the whole relationship in a kiss. You can certainly tell if this person is going to be sexually compatible with you. Yes, yes you can.</p>
<p>So, I say, Ben, kiss away! Kiss freely and with abandon. Kiss every one of these girls on every show. Kiss until you want to kiss no more.</p>
<p>Kissing, after all, is still in the chaste category, for those who throw the &#8220;slut&#8221; term around too readily. One could kiss for days and never get pregnant.</p>
<p>They had a wonderful thing on this horrible episode of The Bachelor, too. Just after Ben and Emily kissed, fireworks lit up the sky above them. I&#8217;m sure it was planned and stage managed, cause that shot was perfect, but man, it was nice. I wish The Bachelor would do more stuff like that. Back to the ROMANCE of it. That is, after all, why people watch.</p>
<p>And if all these lame writers/producers of The Bachelor can come up with for creating romance is to have someone climb up really high above some city, then they need to get out more. Romance is all about intimacy and being real with someone.</p>
<p>They could, actually, take a few lessons from Survivor. Survivor&#8217;s out there battling good and evil in very real ways, just from the people they choose to have on the show. You&#8217;re telling me that no one in Hollywood knows what ROMANCE is about anymore?</p>
<p>Come over here, I&#8217;ll whisper it in your ear.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about KISSING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2012/01/kissing-does-not-make-you-a-slut-and-other-bachelor-conundrums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Fugue of Sex and Love Addiction: Shame</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/a-fugue-of-sex-and-love-addiction-shame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/a-fugue-of-sex-and-love-addiction-shame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 16:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cary Muligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Fassbender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve McQueen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I waited, as I read some of the reviews of Shame. I watched all of the major reviewers sort of dance around trying to figure out if they got what was going on, what this movie was really about. Watched &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/a-fugue-of-sex-and-love-addiction-shame/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I waited, as I read some of the reviews of Shame. I watched all of the major reviewers sort of dance around trying to figure out if they got what was going on, what this movie was really about. Watched for the two words: Sex addiction.</p>
<p>Sadly, I saw them nowhere.</p>
<p>MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD READ THIS REVIEW ONLY AFTER YOU&#8217;VE SEEN SHAME. MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD READ THIS REVIEW ONLY AFTER YOU&#8217;VE SEEN SHAME. MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD READ THIS REVIEW ONLY AFTER YOU&#8217;VE SEEN SHAME. MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD READ THIS REVIEW ONLY AFTER YOU&#8217;VE SEEN SHAME. MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD READ THIS REVIEW ONLY AFTER YOU&#8217;VE SEEN SHAME. MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD READ THIS REVIEW ONLY AFTER YOU&#8217;VE SEEN SHAME. MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD READ THIS REVIEW ONLY AFTER YOU&#8217;VE SEEN SHAME. </p>
<p>But this movie is to Sex Addiction what Days of Wine and Roses is to alcoholism. Ever wanted to know the sordid details behind a sex addict&#8217;s mind? Here you go. The lies, the hidden pornography, the near-constant masturbation. The near destruction of one&#8217;s own life, while being in complete denial about it. All here.</p>
<p>What (also) isn&#8217;t talked about is how his (Michael Fassbender, as our protagonist) sister (Carey Mulligan) suffers from a concurrent love addiction. She bounds into his life from who knows where, and opens up a door on his behavior. Make no mistake, they are cut from the same cloth. </p>
<p>They are both from New Jersey. Brother dear now lives in NY. When sister arrives, she has somehow booked a singing gig at a club. She does a gut-wrenching version of &#8220;New York, New York&#8221; that also makes her otherwise unfeeling brother tear up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting to me that the first time you see both of them completely naked, it&#8217;s not in a sexual way. He, because he&#8217;s taking a piss. She, because she&#8217;s in the shower.</p>
<p>Also, to director Steve McQueen&#8217;s immense credit (which also other reviewers seem to have missed), it&#8217;s incredibly hard to show all the sordidness of a sex addict&#8217;s life, and not make it seem sexy. He does this partly through the script, and partly through excellent camera work and editing.</p>
<p>Sex addiction, for those not savvy to it, makes every person a potential sex object. The sex addict is skilled, like a sexual viper, always able to conquer their prey. But it&#8217;s a nameless faceless game. Know as little about someone as possible. Give away as little of yourself as possible. </p>
<p>So when the phone starts ringing early on, I was puzzled. Not like a sex addict to give out their phone number. Of course, it turns out to be his sister.</p>
<p>Later, he meets someone and goes on an actual date. She asks him how long his longest relationship was, &#8220;Four months,&#8221; he says.</p>
<p>Being present is also a very difficult thing for any addict, but especially a sex addict. So when he asks his date what time period, past or future, she&#8217;d like to live in, she responds: &#8220;Right now.&#8221; He&#8217;s completely perplexed. But she is, indeed, very connected, very present, very in touch with her emotions.</p>
<p>You see this in another way. You&#8217;ve seen his addictive sex in many ways. But when he beds this gorgeous emotionally connected black woman, she touches his face, lovingly. He can&#8217;t go on. He knows nothing of this kind of sex.</p>
<p>But, his sex addiction fuse having been lit, it has to be finished. You see him, moments later, with someone that he picked up from somewhere. Doesn&#8217;t matter. It&#8217;s another drug, and he&#8217;s scored.</p>
<p>The purging that he does after that experience is equivalent to what anyone has to do when they get sober. Alcoholics pour their drink down the sink, drug addicts destroy their paraphernalia, sex addicts throw away all the morass of their secret stashes. Yes, even their computers.</p>
<p>He has his emotions opened up now. He has a big blowout fight with his sister. It&#8217;s quite compellingly shot from behind as they sit on a couch. Sex addict vs. love addict, mano a mano. It&#8217;s brutal, and painful.</p>
<p>He caps his words with a night of sex bingeing that gets quite ugly.</p>
<p>And, in the morning, he is sobbing on the beach. Someone on Twitter said, &#8220;Oh big deal, so he cries on the beach.&#8221; They missed the whole point. It IS a big deal that he was sobbing on the beach. The way for a sex addict to heal (or any addict) is to actually feel their feelings. And yes, that usually does initially involve a lot of crying.</p>
<p>I was hoping that it would all end with Brandon getting into recovery. But that&#8217;s probably too pat and predictable an ending.</p>
<p>The way it actually ended was with one of his sex toys on the train, a married woman who constantly flirts with him. Once he ran out of the train, following her and lost her. This time, she starts flirting, and he remains seated, not taking the bait.</p>
<p>I looked behind his head. In the shot, is a poster for a place called &#8220;The River NYC.&#8221; Not exactly a recovery place, but its website said this: &#8220;Our goal is to create a warm and welcoming space where we can develop a genuine spirituality.&#8221; Yep. Sounds like recovery to me. All you have to do is look around, and find it.</p>
<p>A much better ending.</p>
<p>********************************<br />
ADDENDUM: Roger Ebert mentions it in his <a href="http://www.rogerebert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20111130/REVIEWS/111139997/1023" title="Roger Ebert's Review of Shame">review</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rogerebert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20111130/REVIEWS/111139997/1023" title="Roger Ebert's review of Shame" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p>*********************************</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/a-fugue-of-sex-and-love-addiction-shame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Once Upon a Time Is Magical</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/once-upon-a-time-is-magical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/once-upon-a-time-is-magical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emmys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent the past weekend catching up with some of my many TiVo&#8217;d shows. (2 Broke Girls, Homeland and this one, Once Upon a Time). When I was five years old, I took some of my favorite fairy tales and &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/once-upon-a-time-is-magical/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent the past weekend catching up with some of my many TiVo&#8217;d shows. (2 Broke Girls, Homeland and this one, Once Upon a Time).</p>
<p>When I was five years old, I took some of my favorite fairy tales and rewrote them. My mom thought it was weird. I knew in that moment, I was meant to be a writer.</p>
<p>I think of that when I watch this reworking of many fairy tales, with a twist. &#8220;All of our favorite&#8221; fairy tale characters are here: Snow White, Cinderella, Rumplestiltskin, the evil Queen, heck, even Jiminy Cricket. (I didn&#8217;t think Disney characters counted as &#8220;fairy tale characters,&#8221; but I digress.</p>
<p>The premise is this: The fairy tale characters have been transported to modern times, and they no longer remember who they are/were. Their &#8220;happy endings&#8221; have been stolen (I know the feeling!), and they need one particular woman to get them back. A shaky premise perhaps.</p>
<p>Why it succeeds as a TV show is this: Ginnifer Goodwin as the role she was born to play, Snow White; and Lana Parrilla as the Evil Queen. Throw in a dash of the evil Robert Carlyle as Rumplestilskin/Mr. Gold and you have ratings gold.</p>
<p>Well, also why it&#8217;s succeeding is because you have people who worked on Lost (producers Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis) and a writer from Buffy, the Vampire Slayer (one of the best shows ever on TV) (and that would be Jane Espenson) working on it. (And why have no females directed any of these episodes? Boggles the mind.</p>
<p>Ginnifer Goodwin is always wonderful to watch, and evil Lana Parrilla has never been better. They really make these fairy tale characters come to life. Robert Carlyle chews off huge hunks of that scenery, but is fun to watch.</p>
<p>The first few episodes (including the wondrous &#8220;Snow Falls&#8221;) are quite amusing. By the Cinderella storyline (&#8220;The Price of Gold&#8221;), they were kinda losing me. Cinderella was pretty boring compared to Goodwin and Parrilla. Plus, Snow White&#8217;s beloved is named Prince Charming, and there&#8217;s quite a bit of wonderful banter back and forth about that. Then Cinderella&#8217;s story comes up, and isn&#8217;t her Prince also named Charming? They kinda don&#8217;t even give the guy a name, other than &#8220;Thomas.&#8221; Um, ok.</p>
<p>So, they are using the bits of fairy tales we know and kind of fabricating whatever they need to flesh out their own stories. With the whole Snow White/Evil Queen thing, it&#8217;s working quite well. Cinderella kinda failed.</p>
<p>I mean, as fairy tales go, Cinderella is at least as big a deal as Snow White (most little girls would say moreso), and we don&#8217;t even get to see her pumpkin carriage. We go from her sweeping to her having a nice dress on, and then POOF! She&#8217;s married. And then with child.</p>
<p>So, if they are going to rush through the big fairy tales like this (although I didn&#8217;t mind, cause the actress was dreadful), what&#8217;s left for further seasons? In fact, Snow White&#8217;s child (Jennifer Morrison, not quite up to the acting talents of Parrilla or Goodwin) is back in town, and she&#8217;s on the mystery. So once she solves it, which could be by the end of the season, then what?</p>
<p>Quite unclear. Doesn&#8217;t really seem anywhere for them to go after that.</p>
<p>But in the best episode so far, &#8220;Snow Falls,&#8221; we discover how Snow White and Prince Charming met (and wouldn&#8217;t you know it? He&#8217;s married/engaged to someone else. (Depending on which of the time frames you are in.) Although in both of them, it&#8217;s quite clear that he&#8217;s really in love with Snow White.</p>
<p>Did you know Prince Charming&#8217;s real name? It&#8217;s James. The banter between them is charming, not inspid.</p>
<p>I really liked the show, I just hope that they get back to the Snow White/evil Queen dynamic as often as possible. That is what is truly magical here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/once-upon-a-time-is-magical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moneyball: Way too on the money</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/moneyball-way-too-on-the-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/moneyball-way-too-on-the-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Sorkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Pitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonah Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moneyball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Seymour Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Zaillian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you love a good baseball movie? Does thinking about Field of Dreams or Bull Durham just get you all wistful? Or The National? Yeah, me too. Moneyball is none of those. Or were you stunned and amazed by Russell &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/moneyball-way-too-on-the-money/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you love a good baseball movie? Does thinking about Field of Dreams or Bull Durham just get you all wistful? Or The National? Yeah, me too. Moneyball is none of those.</p>
<p>Or were you stunned and amazed by Russell Crowe&#8217;s mathematical brilliance in Beautiful Mind? Well, me, not so much.</p>
<p>But this movie is kind of a combination of those two. If you&#8217;re going for a rousing baseball movie, you&#8217;d best stay home. Ditto if the sight of math (especially math on a screen) starts putting you into heaves.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t know what to make of this movie. There are so many reasons I wanted to like it.</p>
<p>For instance, I attended with my friend who (GASP!) had never even HEARD of Aaron Sorkin, much less cottoned to his patented &#8220;walk and talks.&#8221; Sorkin, though, is the second credited writer on this. After Steven Zaillian. Now, if one has a discussion of the top ten living screenwriters today, it&#8217;s pretty assured that both of those names would be on the list.</p>
<p>Still, the script pretty much left me cold.</p>
<p>Part of it was the script (or lack of it), part of it was the ham-fisted direction by Bennett Miller. You can just read the page in your mind: &#8220;and he tears up, hearing his little girl&#8217;s voice. He decides to stay.&#8221; CUT TO: Tears in his eyes.</p>
<p>No joke. The final (supposed to be poignant shot, I guess) was a close-up of tears in Brad Pitt&#8217;s eyes. I wanted to barf.</p>
<p>And you would think that with eight (and counting) little brats of his own, that he&#8217;d be able to convey this fatherliness that warrants the end tear-up. I musta missed it.</p>
<p>Also, while his team is out there, struggling it out, Brad Pitt&#8217;s character is anywhere but on the field or watching. He&#8217;s working out, he&#8217;s in his office, he&#8217;s driving, far away. Why? Well, if you rustle your popcorn at the wrong time you&#8217;ll miss it, but his little tyke at one point says, &#8220;You&#8217;re not gonna jinx it, go back.&#8221;</p>
<p>From this, I guess, that you are supposed to glean that he&#8217;s afraid of jinxing his own team. That&#8217;s why he stays away. And, to hammer that point home, he returns when they have an 11-point lead. The other teams starts scoring. It ends up tied.</p>
<p>Do we cut to the drama on the field? No, been there, done that. Instead, we get Pitt, agonizing in the locker room about whether or not he&#8217;s jinxing them. Yikes.</p>
<p>Maudlin crap like that.</p>
<p>So, the direction was dreadful. But let&#8217;s get back to the story.</p>
<p>Now, if it&#8217;s a good baseball movie, it should be understandable by anyone who watches it, whatever their level of baseball knowledge.</p>
<p>And I love baseball. I wouldn&#8217;t claim to be intimate with all its arcana, though.</p>
<p>The premise here is that MLB had gotten too full of its britches, offering million-dollar contracts to people who really didn&#8217;t deserve them. And that some Yale dude had figured out a mathematical way to know who deserved to be hired and who didn&#8217;t. Based on how often they got on base. Mathematically.</p>
<p>Jonah Hill does the best with this that he can. Coach Phillip Seymour Hoffman, who still wants to coach baseball his way, adds some fire to a nothing role.</p>
<p>But to me, in the end, baseball is really about those guys out there on the bases. Not the money men counting out their worth in back rooms. This movie dealt far too much with those guys. Did this new way of &#8220;counting&#8221; change baseball? Apparently so. </p>
<p>Do we care? No matter how many close-uped tears you shoot, the answer is still no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/moneyball-way-too-on-the-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young Adult Is Infinitely Missable</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/young-adult-is-infinitely-missable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/young-adult-is-infinitely-missable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlize Theron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diablo Cody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Reaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patton Oswalt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Adult]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The central problem for why &#8220;Young Adult&#8221; is so terrible is that its protagonist is loathesome. I dunno. Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but I no longer find someone drinking too much, acting out when drunk, or acting out when seriously &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/young-adult-is-infinitely-missable/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The central problem for why &#8220;Young Adult&#8221; is so terrible is that its protagonist is loathesome.</p>
<p>I dunno. Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but I no longer find someone drinking too much, acting out when drunk, or acting out when seriously love-addicted, to be a funny thing. I cannot root for this person, other than to root that they seriously find rehab soon.</p>
<p>Our lead, Mavis Gary, is hell-bent on her own destruction, chasing down her &#8220;true love,&#8221; who is happily married and just had a child. She plans to steal him away. This never goes well, nor is it a viable plot premise anymore, I would argue.</p>
<p>(I found Julia Roberts similarly reprehensible in &#8220;My Best Friend&#8217;s Wedding,&#8221; though her guy was not quite married yet in that one. No matter, same conniving horribleness at hand.)</p>
<p>So, beautiful statuesque Charlize Theron (who does give this part the old college try) drinks way too much. In real life, if someone drank as much as she did, she would not be in any semblance of shape, certainly would not have the flawless skin that she has (no matter how many facials she received; the movie shows us no less than three times that she gets manis and pedis and spends a lot of time with her hair and face). No, in fact a woman who drinks like this would be already developing that bulbous red nose thing that many full-blown alcoholics get.</p>
<p>But then, this is a romantic comedy right, with the guy who&#8217;s not the guy she&#8217;s chasing whom she&#8217;s supposed to fall in love with. And SPOILER they don&#8217;t. She spends most of her time bending his ear about her totally-in denial love addiction plan. He tells her she&#8217;s crazy and needs therapy (true!). After making a complete fool of herself later, she consents to sloppy last-stand sex with him, and leaves him and his sister (&#8220;Take me with you!&#8221; she demands; Mavis doesn&#8217;t, with the cold line, &#8220;No, you&#8217;re good here.&#8221; Here being their vapid small town.)</p>
<p>Just a loathesome person from start to finish, who learns nothing along the way.</p>
<p>Other actors: Patrick Wilson as the &#8220;true love&#8221; is wonderful. Elizabeth Reaser (what is with her as &#8220;the other woman&#8221;? Between this and &#8220;The Good Wife,&#8221; sheesh), but she&#8217;s also wonderful as the man&#8217;s wife. </p>
<p>Even Patton Oswalt, getting more and more juicy roles in cinema, is quite the charmer.</p>
<p>I loved &#8220;Juno.&#8221; Normally, I like Diablo Cody. Didn&#8217;t like this. Normally, I like Jason Reitman, the director. Didn&#8217;t like this.</p>
<p>(Although the nihilistic end of the world Kendra-Kardashian double bill on her TV screens was a wonderful touch.)</p>
<p>This movie is really best avoided. Unlike you like loud mouthy desperate out of control love-addicted alcoholics. Then, you might find this a laugh riot. Me, I like to like my protagonists.</p>
<p>Or, you might wanna really punish yourself. Go see this on a double feature with that sex addiction movie, Shame. Fun times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/12/young-adult-is-infinitely-missable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who should be the new Oscar host?</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/who-should-be-the-new-oscar-host/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/who-should-be-the-new-oscar-host/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Ratner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Finnerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Mohr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Fallon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loni Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meltdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricky Gervais]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, who should we have hosting the Oscars this year? Hurry, people, time’s a wasting… Eddie Murphy’s out (*sob*). Totally joking. I can’t stand Eddie Murphy, and he would’ve made a terrible host. In fact, all ego-maniacs need not apply, &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/who-should-be-the-new-oscar-host/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, who should we have hosting the Oscars this year? Hurry, people, time’s a wasting…<br />
Eddie Murphy’s out (*sob*). Totally joking. I can’t stand Eddie Murphy, and he would’ve  made a terrible host. In fact, all ego-maniacs need not apply, so sit down Will Smith.</p>
<p>It really and truly should be a comedian of some flavor, because it needs to be someone who will keep on with the funny when people are staring at him/her blankly.</p>
<p>It should be someone who knows Hollywood and isn’t too fanlike about it (Rosie O’Donnell can sit down).  But someone who is also sufficiently deferential to it. (David Letterman can sit WAY down and take both Uma and Oprah with him.)</p>
<p>It should be someone who can sing and dance, so the old standbys come to mind: Hugh Jackman (busy with that Les Miz movie), Neil Patrick Harris (busy with his TV show). Billy Crystal has just done  it too much. He also needs to sit down.</p>
<p>Someone who thinks quickly on their feet, preferably someone comfortable with improve or standup, cause stuff happens at the Oscars that you just have to be prepared for, and willing to go off script for. (Steve Martin can sit WAY down.)</p>
<p>While we’re at it, forget the youngsters (especially after the “talking too freely” that got Brett Ratner bounced, we have to have some older dude or dudette who isn’t going to let the wrong thing slip. Who knows the meaning of politically correct, yet is savvy enough to know who to take jabs at (and who NOT TO). Please sit Ricky Gervais down and shut him the hell up. And while you’re at it, take that drink out of his hand.</p>
<p>So, in short, someone who’s polite, savvy about Hollywood, works hard enough to step in to this madness quickly, someone who can sing and dance or at least tell a good joke.<br />
My own personal short list would be this: Craig Ferguson or Jimmy Fallon (though, this being ABC, probably not likely), Dan Finnerman (from “the Dan Band”)—he would rock it!, Marc Maron, Chris Hardwick, Jay Mohr.</p>
<p>Women? There aren’t too many choices there. Kathy Griffin comes to mind, but she has the sassy mouth that got Ratner bounced. You know who would be a fantastic female Oscar host? Loni Love! She would rock that Kodak. And you know she looks great in some gowns.</p>
<p>Or maybe Ricki Lake, after she wins Dancing with the Stars, to promote her new talk show? Nah. Loni Love would be better.</p>
<p><strong>Those would be my final choices: either Dan Finnerman or Loni Love.</strong></p>
<p>Boy, would those be some fun Oscars. Enough with the overpriced, full of themselves celebs and young people who haven’t got a clue. These two have been around the block a time or two.</p>
<p>Another wacky, but perfect choice? Ross Matthews. You know he respects the Oscars enough. It may even compensate for his youth and inexperience. He’d be a great choice.</p>
<p>What say you?<br />
***************************************************</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/who-should-be-the-new-oscar-host/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let them eat cake: the Kardashian trainwreck</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/let-them-eat-cake-the-kardashian-trainwreck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/let-them-eat-cake-the-kardashian-trainwreck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$17 Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trainwreck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We already know that the world is changing in a big way. People are marching in the streets against the excesses of greedy corrupt politicians and Wall Street types. But let me explain a bit more the world as I &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/let-them-eat-cake-the-kardashian-trainwreck/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already know that the world is changing in a big way. People are marching in the streets against the excesses of greedy corrupt politicians and Wall Street types. </p>
<p>But let me explain a bit more the world as I see it. On the one hand, we have strong fervent intellectuals who care about each other and the environment (Michael Moore, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Angela Davis, Marianne Williamson are among those who&#8217;ve spoken at one #OccupyAmerica protest or another.). On the other side, you can pick any antagonist: the Koch Brothers; Herman Cain, bought by the Kochs; any of the Wall Street bankers who should be in jail right now; Dick Cheney, war criminal; any of countless others.</p>
<p>For this article, however, I choose to focus on the travesty that is Kim Kardashian. If ever there were a Marie Antoinette among the sorry lot, she is ours. </p>
<p>On the one side, we have people starving because they can&#8217;t find work, living on the streets because their homes have been foreclosed, unemployment&#8217;s run out and the Republicans won&#8217;t give us any more. Many millions of you can fill in this blank. It&#8217;s too sad and depressing.</p>
<p>But, on the other side, we have the family Kardashian, most notably Kim, who is arguably the prettiest. One might be comfortable admiring her for her beauty if only she remained quiet and didn&#8217;t wreak such havoc on our senses.</p>
<p>Remember back when &#8220;reality TV&#8221; started?  And I mean back in the days when it wasn&#8217;t scripted, when what was happening was really real? (Only Survivor still remains so.) For the others, we have some writers somewhere coming up with grand scenarios for our viewing pleasures, to distract us from the travesties at home. The worst, the absolute worst of these (yes, in many ways even worse than the Jersey Shore nonsense and those &#8220;Housewives&#8221;) is the Kardashian clan. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure exactly HOW MANY shows they have on E!, but if it&#8217;s even more than one, that&#8217;s too many. They just always seem to be on the channel when I skim around. Living a life of boredom and idle richness. Getting mad at a boyfriend because he playfully pushes her in the lake when she is wearing $35,000 earrings. Mindless things like that. Supposed to, I suppose, make us jealous. In fact, it makes me as sick as those Housewives do (not that I watch either, but they do cross my consciousness FAR too much). </p>
<p>I suppose a Kardashian show or eight would be bad enough (and it is). But the worst, the trainwreck of which I speak that makes me want to throw up as I type this is the wedding.</p>
<p>Mind you, the rest of the country (if I may speak for all of you here) is pretty much living frugally, scrimping, saving, trying desperately to make ends meet. We are all about authenticity. We seek transparency in our social media and government. We speak truth to each other, cause brother, that&#8217;s all we&#8217;ve got left these days.</p>
<p>In the Kardashian world, it&#8217;s all made-up nonsense (well, except the part about her liking the black boys). She was (that would be Kim) was flabbergasted that people who meet her on the street &#8220;actually believe&#8221; that the stories being pumped at us by E! are thought to be true. Well, yes, cause that&#8217;s the way WE live. In our own truth.</p>
<p>Miss Kardashian and company, who became famous solely because their father got murderer OJ an acquital, well, and maybe because she has a nice butt, live in the Land of Denial. Everything is fake. Her nails, her scenarios and, as it turns out, her boyfriends and husbands.</p>
<p>Now, for those blissfully living in other countries, and missing all this Americana, let me school you. The tabloid-trash TV channel E! saw that Prince marries a commoner thing happening in England, and decided it wanted that for its very self. Cause after all, according to them (I&#8217;m so not making this up, &#8220;The Kardashians are our country&#8217;s royalty.&#8221;) Really? In what universe? Say &#8220;the Kennedys&#8221; and you could have a discussion. But &#8220;the Kardashians&#8221;? HARDLY.</p>
<p>Mind you, again, this is a country where people are desperate for jobs, where they know the existence of every soup kitchen just so they can get some food. </p>
<p>The Kardashians were gifted extravagances in the vicinity of $17MILLION + for their wedding. Kim&#8217;s wedding to some jamoke. SEVENTEEN MILLION DOLLARS and counting. (Counting because her dress was gifted, her shoes were gifted, etc.) The $17M was just for the WEDDING ITSELF.</p>
<p>It was a lavish spectacle of hype, which I was so sickened by, I scrupulously avoided it like the plague. But I couldn&#8217;t help being bombarded by E!&#8217;s nonstop hype-o-rama of it. Two weeks before: Here Comes the Kardashian Wedding! Only on E!<br />
Every day: &#8220;Bet you can&#8217;t wait, the Kardashian Wedding! America&#8217;s Royalty&#8221; and blah and blah and blah some more&#8230;</p>
<p>The TWO DAY SPECIAL was hyped nearly every hour. TWO DAYS to broadcast this monstrousity in its entirety. This lovefest. This joining of two fame whores in splashy E! garish union. Cameras everywhere. Other fame whores in attendance, or E! stalwarts.</p>
<p>Chelsea Handler, who is one of the few decent things on E!, did not attend. A member of her regular troupe of players did. Cause really, who are Kim Kardashian&#8217;s actual friends? People that E! pays work just fine.</p>
<p>The whole wedding got me pretty steamed. Or nauseated, depending on the day.</p>
<p>The after-examination as E!&#8217;s other stalwart, Joan Rivers, dished the gowns of people in attendance. Oh, did I mention? Kim had THREE. THREE wedding gowns. One for the ceremony, one for the reception. I don&#8217;t even know what the other one was for. For the hop into the limo to head to the honeymoon? Who knows? Who cares? I wish I didn&#8217;t know these stupid facts. (You can imagine how ever-pervasive this nonsense had to be: I was studiously avoiding all mention of this crap, and still I gleaned bits here and there of data about it.)</p>
<p>But now, 73 days later, 73 days and $17M squandered later, this marriage made in TV heaven is no more. The divorce papers are on their way. And that makes me even angrier.</p>
<p>I was thinking of that other reality show (the only real one left), Survivor, which this season has the evil Russell Hantz&#8217;s nephew, Brandon, fighting out between Good and Evil. In interview, he said he was &#8220;trying to reclaim his family&#8217;s good name.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tonight, the day after the divorce announcement, the &#8220;good Kardashian&#8221;, brother Rob was hoofing out his angst on Dancing with the Stars. He didn&#8217;t say it, but he&#8217;s doing the only thing possible to &#8220;redeem his family&#8217;s good name.&#8221; Showing the benefits of actual hard work. (As his boorish, ill-mannered sisters heckle and jeer from the sidelines, there&#8217;s Rob, who feels like he doesn&#8217;t fit in with his family.) All I can say to you, Rob, is: Good thing. They make me want to throw up.</p>
<p>I sincerely cannot even look at any of them anymore. Please God, make them go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/11/let-them-eat-cake-the-kardashian-trainwreck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arrogant Maks takes aim at stodgy Len: DWTS</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/arrogant-maks-takes-aim-at-stodgy-len-dwts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/arrogant-maks-takes-aim-at-stodgy-len-dwts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing with the Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Arquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derek Hough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erin Andrews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hope Solo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirstie Alley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Len]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maksim Chmerkovsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Ballas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricki Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unprofessional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, it&#8217;s a dance show based on the premise that professional dancers can make complete non-pros look good. People who&#8217;ve never before danced are all of a sudden doing dance counts in their heads and rumbaing with the best of &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/arrogant-maks-takes-aim-at-stodgy-len-dwts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, it&#8217;s a dance show based on the premise that professional dancers can make complete non-pros look good. People who&#8217;ve never before danced are all of a sudden doing dance counts in their heads and rumbaing with the best of &#8216;em. All well and good.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve got fabulous costumes and makeup (and an amazing new set this season). Lots of lights and sparkle make them look good. What they do seem to be lacking this season is some kind of director.</p>
<p>One who, for example, will tell the boisterous, raucous crowd, YES, even those Kardashians, to shut the hell up, because the judges and the opinion of the judges is what&#8217;s most important (at least until the public votes, anyway). Who the hell made these Kardashians so darned important? Their brother is dancing, and you see them, front row, talking back to the judges, hogging camera time. Get over it.</p>
<p>Same kind of beside the point nonsense went on last season when mama Palin was there to watch her daughter Bristol go WAY WAY WAY further in that competition than she ever should have. Pathetic and sad, and happily there was a public outcry that still hasn&#8217;t died down.</p>
<p>But, for better or for worse, and despite the screaming obnoxious throngs, we are now down to the last seven contestants. Among them, one I consider to be one of the worst (even before last night), soccer player Hope Solo.</p>
<p>I saw her dance last night, but I have to admit, I think she is so dreadful I was consciously trying not to watch her. Plus, I find Maks to be really sexy, so it&#8217;s easy to watch him instead.</p>
<p>The judges, in commenting, said it was &#8220;one of her worst dances.&#8221; Len, in his comments, noted that it was better that she&#8217;s not wearing heels, as they seem to throw off her dancing. In Len&#8217;s defense, I think this is a valid comment. She doesn&#8217;t seem at all comfortable with the &#8220;girly&#8221; part of this dancing thing.</p>
<p>Maks, before the judging even finished, went off on poor Len. Maks was pissed that the judges worry about something so superficial as a heel. He stormed off moments later to his on-camera interview and said, &#8220;It&#8217;s MY SHOW!&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? When did it become Maks&#8217; show? Len&#8217;s been there since the beginning, too, has he not? Did I miss something? Or is it just Maks&#8217; overwhelming arrogance?</p>
<p>Also in defense of Len, these contestants are, by and large, terrible. They are not dancers. The professionals try to dance circles around them, to not let the public know that they are really terrible, but they are. (Except for nearly professional dancer Nicole Scherzinger a couple of seasons ago, who rightly won the trophy. She was a joy to watch.)</p>
<p>And Len, by this point, must run out of things to say that don&#8217;t crush these people completely, yet accurately point out their mistakes. Hope Solo deserved (and got) bad scores for this dance. I sincerely hope that she is voted out tomorrow night. Between her bad dancing and Maks&#8217; arrogance, they both need to sit this one out, and let some of the actually good and respectful dancers come to the forefront.</p>
<p>Maks should take a cue from Derek Hough. He&#8217;s been there &#8220;since the beginning too.&#8221; As far as I know, it&#8217;s &#8220;his show&#8221; too, in fact moreso than Maks, since he&#8217;s won more Mirror Ball Trophies from his dancing/choreography. You don&#8217;t see him getting all arrogant and in Len&#8217;s face about judging marks. They just try harder next week.</p>
<p>For that matter (although I&#8217;m currently rooting for David Arquette), I hope that Ricki Lake wins this season. She is working her butt off, and Derek is providing truly inspired choreography (something only Derek Hough and Mark Ballas seem to be able to do on this show). THEIR choreography lifts even the worst dancers into realms they could only dream of, if the &#8220;celebrity&#8221; is capable of doing it. Who knows? Maks could have fantastic choreography, that Hope isn&#8217;t even capable of carrying out. (I did really like Maks&#8217;s season with Erin Andrews. That dancing was truly inspired. And his season with Kirstie Alley was pretty fun, too. Can&#8217;t always have great partners, Maks.)</p>
<p>In any case, I thought Len and Maks&#8217; little spat was really unprofessional and out of line. They need to stop and get back to the dancing.</p>
<p>*************************************************</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/arrogant-maks-takes-aim-at-stodgy-len-dwts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/podcast-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/podcast-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diggnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith and the Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Pollak's Chat Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBreak Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Never Not Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Nerdist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF with Marc Maron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I listen to a large amount of podcasts. From the beginning. I decided that I wanted to have my reviews for them posted on my page. So I&#8217;m going to do a bunch of them here, and update them as &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/podcast-reviews/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listen to a large amount of podcasts. From the beginning. I decided that I wanted to have my reviews for them posted on my page. So I&#8217;m going to do a bunch of them here, and update them as I listen.</p>
<p><strong>DIGGNATION</strong></p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ve been watching Diggnation from the beginning, but I just started doing the reviews at 171. Sigh.</p>
<p><strong>171. Hummer</strong> Kevin and Alex explore more Michelob beers. Do chicks dig leather couches? (This chick says yes.) Alex: &#8220;Being bent over one of these things? I don&#8217;t know.&#8221; This is a best-of-the-year Diggnation. </p>
<p><strong>172. Live from London: Alex Proposes!</strong> &#8220;The Tuna Pocket.&#8221; So many people! Alex proposed, but off camera. Awww. Hippie Glen chugs a beer. Sheep chase Kevin, and Scoble takes pictures. How to pay down your credit card debt. Really incredible footage from the Dead Space game. &#8220;If you invested $1000 a year ago, you&#8217;d have (average) $21. If you bought $1000 in beer, and took the cans back for recycling money, you&#8217;d have $241.00.&#8221; Wow.</p>
<p><strong>173. Shot Through the Glass</strong> Virgin in London offers a taxi/limo service on motorcycles. Looks very cool. They also have a tour of Virgin in London. Very cool conference rooms. Kevin and Alex have a bizarre idea for an iPhone app for your cat. Really awesome site: www.macrumors.com. Click on the Buyer&#8217;s Guide, to see when the latest one was released, and when the next one might come out. Fabulous info! Kevin and Alex have a difference of opinion about Krispy Kreme (Alex is right). All about eyebrow threading and Rachel Ray. Rachel Ray and corn. Oh my! Alex: &#8220;Pound away, my friend, just don&#8217;t get caught on tape doing it.&#8221; Kevin is cancelling his cable, and just doing Netflix and Hulu. RE: Internet fame Kevin: &#8220;Everybody&#8217;s got to have their own little thing.&#8221; Prager&#8217;s Borg bear. Kevin: &#8220;You&#8217;d have to be blazing hot in order for me to do that.&#8221; Fabulous footage of driving around London. More on the wonderful Virgin offices. The candy dispenser! Kevin (in the &#8220;Love&#8221; room): &#8220;I guarantee people have thrown down in this room.&#8221; The poster of Virgin history is phenomenal.</p>
<p><strong>174. Alex&#8217;s Halloween Arachnophobia</strong> Um&#8230; Kevin and Alex are wearing hats. Cutbacks at Revision 3. Kevin has a new MacBook (unrelated). It&#8217;s beautiful. Even Alex likes it. Alex: &#8220;Do you think aliens exist?&#8221; Kevin: &#8220;Sure. To rule them out would be foolish.&#8221; Hippie Glenn: &#8220;I&#8217;ve met &#8216;em.&#8221; By this point in the show, these hats make them look hot. Time Warner vs. ATT Uverse. Alex is a bit afraid of spiders. &#8220;Pragerpedia.&#8221; Watch how red Alex gets when he accidentally says a bad word in the GoDaddy ad. hehe</p>
<p><strong>175. No Shoes</strong> First time Kevin and Alex wear no shoes on the podcast (Alex barefoot, Kevin with socks). Kevin thinks that Star Wars MMORPGs shouldn&#8217;t focus on killing, but on working things out mentally (since that&#8217;s what Jedis do). &#8220;You wanna have the Jedis that are meditating, and expanding their mind with tea,&#8221; Alex. &#8220;It&#8217;s not about leveling up by killing things,&#8221; Kevin. They don&#8217;t know who won the presidential election yet. Kevin does&#8217;t wanna group with people. He wants to be a &#8220;lone wolf.&#8221; Kevin is astonished that the US Army thinks &#8220;Twitter is a terrorist tool.&#8221;  Kevin is astonished that among the people to fear, the US Army adds &#8220;vegetarians.&#8221; Kevin&#8217;s pretty drunk. Hippie Glen messes with the audio, cause he&#8217;s a radical vegetarian. Kevin enlightens the Army about &#8220;voice-changing technology.&#8221; Alex and Kevin talk about whether or not the government is behind the times. They applaud DARPA and some other agencies that are ahead of the times. &#8220;I&#8217;m not a terrorist, just because we have followers.&#8221; They want to go back to Japan. Alex: &#8220;I&#8217;m gonna kill you, eat your face, and then snowboard.&#8221; (About being a vampire at Mammouth.) Kevin and Alex discuss whether or not AIDS would affect vampires. &#8220;They&#8217;re not even alive!&#8221; says Alex. &#8220;Blood transfusions are no joke,&#8221; Kevin. Whether or not a leather couch would be good for sex. &#8220;This is the best email we&#8217;ve ever got,&#8221; Alex. &#8220;It&#8217;s gonna be good. Who cares if you get a little sweaty and sticky?&#8221; Kevin. </p>
<p><strong>KEITH &#038; THE GIRL</strong></p>
<p><strong>BEST SHOWS (early variety)</strong><br />
1. The Pat O&#8217;Brien Phone Sex Tapes<br />
2. Jeff the Jerkoff<br />
3. Customer Service<br />
4. Show No. 1</p>
<p><strong>WORST SHOWS (don&#8217;t listen)</strong><br />
1. Marriage and Hookers<br />
2. Scams &#038; Horrors<br />
3. Bartleby the Scrivener</p>
<p><strong>22. Mitch Hedberg, Hippies and the Pope</strong> I was just thinking how swoony (and in love) Chemda sounds when talking about Keith in this ep. Then, the next one&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>23. Pay Your Fuckin Tab</strong> Keith takes another girl on a date (which he says isn&#8217;t a date, but he pays for the movie and dinner. And he takes her to see Sin City.). Did anyone tell Chemda about how much SEX is in this movie? He keeps saying that &#8220;she wouldn&#8217;t have liked it,&#8221; but I&#8217;d be PISSED if my boyfriend took some other girl to this movie… Hm. I think this ep is the beginning of the end (of their relationship, anyway). And, I think this girl blew him, and he&#8217;s lying about it. Also, how Keith &#038; Chemda met. Some other crap about people not paying a tab. Further crap about Michael Jackson. All the car crashes by Keith and Chemda&#8217;s. Keith: &#8220;It&#8217;s always worth it to punch someone.&#8221; K &#038; C don&#8217;t get excited about going to see Jane Fonda and Bloc Party, since they are missing Greg Giraldo and Bruce Willis. Chemda thinks they put the pretty people in front at talk shows. Keith thinks Terri Hatcher is hot, cause &#8220;she&#8217;s skinny.&#8221; Also thinks Rene Russo is hot. Keith gets kicked out of The Late Show with David Letterman. &#8220;That&#8217;s why I want to be famous, and be on Letterman.&#8221; Some Greg Giraldo comedy. FOUR STARS and major gaping mouth action</p>
<p><strong>24. I&#8217;ll Find You, John Petrie</strong> Peter Jennings is dying. More on Terry Schiavo. The Michael Jackson trial. Keith gets irate about someone stealing some of his stuff. About how drug addicts love to talk about others, say Keith and Chemda about people they lived with. Bums who sell &#8220;camcorders.&#8221; Keith: &#8220;Remember crack is fucking awesome.&#8221; THREE STARS </p>
<p><strong>25. The Relationship Hour</strong> Keith and Chemda see Farrah Fawcett at the Late Late Show with David Letterman. Keith: &#8220;[Farrah Fawcett and Anna Nicole] should have a crazy-off. My money&#8217;s on Farrah Fawcett.&#8221; Black albinos. How Chemda hit on Keith. They both hated their first kiss. And had sex on their first date. Chemda: &#8220;That&#8217;s a big thing with Keith. Do not be cunty to the waiter.&#8221; Chemda: &#8220;There&#8217;s a lot of Ews in this one, and I don&#8217;t like it.&#8221; K &#038; C talk about getting married. THREE STARS </p>
<p><strong>26. Oy to the Vey</strong> Crank calls. Useless for other people. Boring as crap. In-depth Jewishness. Keith&#8217;s dad is a bad tipper. Keith&#8217;s dad&#8217;s jobs. Hasidic Jews leave their hats on in strip clubs. Lameness. Some more anti-Jewness. ONE STAR </p>
<p><strong>27. Then Stop Acting Like Your Stereotype</strong> Keith gets hateful email about the last racist show. Chemda defends her Jewishness &#8220;coming from love.&#8221; This week&#8217;s racist group to mock? &#8220;Indians.&#8221; (Dot Indians) Keith does a party for Indians. They are a bit reserved. Chemda has tooth problems. TWO STARS</p>
<p><strong>28. How to Get Pregnant</strong> Chemda&#8217;s ordeals at the gyno and the dentist. Clown agent rondelle. Getting pregnant from basketball player&#8217;s blowjob sperm. Tricks to get pregnant. KATG&#8217;s problems with audio. THREE STARS</p>
<p><strong>KEVIN POLLAK&#8217;S CHAT SHOW </strong><br />
(I&#8217;ll go back and write up my reviews for the early shows at some point.)</p>
<p><strong>1. Paget Brewster.</strong> Great interview out of the gate. Wise, funny, so watchable. She talks about how she and Jon Hamm used to be &#8220;pilot killers.&#8221; FOUR STARS<br />
1. part 2. Elon Motors guy.<br />
2. part 1.<br />
2. part 2.<br />
3. part 1.<br />
3. part 2.<br />
4. part 1.<br />
4. part 2.<br />
5. part 1.<br />
5. part 2.<br />
6. part 1.<br />
6. part 2.</p>
<p><strong>7. part 1. Matthew Perry.</strong> Need we say more? This was one of the best KPCS podcasts ever. FOUR STARS<br />
<strong>7. part 2. more Matthew Perry.</strong> He&#8217;s awesome. FOUR STARS<br />
<strong>8. part 1. Curt Smith.</strong> From Tears for Fears. He wrote a song for Kevin&#8217;s show. TWO STARS<br />
<strong>8. part 2. Felicia Day.</strong> She is wonderful. She talks about Dr. Horrible, and how she made The Guild herself. FOUR STARS<br />
9. part 1. ??<br />
<strong>9. part 2. Josh Malina.</strong> TWO STARS<br />
<strong>10. part 1. Adam Carolla.</strong> TWO STARS<br />
<strong>10. part 2. Dana Carvey.</strong> Fun stuff. Kevin and Dana knew each other back in the day, starting out in standup comedy. A treasure trove of memories. Carvey seems to have difficulty talking about himself. FOUR STARS<br />
<strong>11. part 1. Nia Vardalos.</strong> How she got &#8220;Big Fat Greek Weddng&#8221; made. Possibly the best Larry King Game ever. THREE STARS<br />
<strong>11. part 2. Ileana Douglas.</strong> Much more entertaining than I thought it would be. She knows/knew a lot of people. On making &#8220;Action.&#8221; THREE STARS<br />
<strong>12. Dan Finnerty.</strong> He explains &#8220;The Dan Show,&#8221; and what it&#8217;s like to be married to Kathy Najimy. THREE STARS<br />
<strong>13. Kevin Smith.</strong> Can this man talk? Um, YES, he can. I unsubscribed from &#8220;Smodcast&#8221; and &#8220;Hollywood Babble On&#8221; after watching (er, suffering through) this podcast. ZERO STARS<br />
<strong>14. Mike Binder.</strong> About the movies he&#8217;s made, being a director, his new restaurant. THREE STARS<br />
<strong>15. Nick Swardson.</strong> Eh. He works with Adam Sandler, and does comedy. TWO STARS<br />
<strong>16. Jason Lee.</strong> Hear all about how Jason used to be a skateboarder before he started acting. Through the whole interview, he never seems really sure why he&#8217;s there. TWO STARS<br />
<strong>17. Craig Bierko.</strong> Bierko gets all hot and sweaty. Talks about his Broadway chops, and how he never really understood what the hell David E. Kelley was having him say on Boston Legal. THREE STARS<br />
<strong>18. Rob Huebel and Paul Scheer.</strong> I found this extremely annoying as an episode, but people who like their comedy, or people who salivate over improvers finishing each other&#8217;s sentences will salivate over this ep. ZERO STARS<br />
<strong>19, part 1. Samm Levine.</strong> The guest was supposed to be a director, but since Inglorious Basterds just opened, Samm is a convenient choice, and the first ever repeat guest. ONE STAR (for the lame masturbatory vibe)<br />
<strong>19, part 2. Steve Agee.</strong> Yawn. Steve is BIG. Kevin is not. Fun topic of convo. Not. NO STARS<br />
<strong>20. Hank Azaria.</strong> They talk poker. They talk voiceover acting. They talk Huff. Good good stuff here. FOUR STARS<br />
<strong>21. Seth McFarlane.</strong> McFarlane talks about going to the Rhode Island School of Design, working for Disney, and how the mega show Family Guy was saved by the fans. FOUR STARS<br />
<strong>22. Rob Corddry.</strong> About  being a writer on the Daily Show. TWO STARS<br />
<strong>23. Michael Gladis and Rich Sommer (from Mad Men).</strong> Jon Hamm is not the only hottie from this show. They talk about the early days, the &#8220;unicorn&#8221; dilemma, how Michael had to audition again after his contract had been signed. And how great it is to work on this show. FOUR STARS<br />
<strong>24, part 1. Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova.</strong> Stick to comedians, Kev. Wow, does this slow down to molasses! Singers, not his specialty. Struggling with success. What it&#8217;s like to win an Oscar. How Glen met Van Morrison. Singing at Eunice Kennedy&#8217;s funeral. No mention of: &#8220;Are you a couple? Are you not? What&#8217;s up with that?&#8221; TWO STARS<br />
<strong>24, part 2. Jane Campion.</strong> Her intro to Cannes. On her filmmaking process. Kevin and Jane on the joy of writing. Jane: &#8220;Everybody is extraordinary.&#8221; The power of discovering Keats and Fanny&#8217;s love letters. &#8220;Who wants to tell stories about poets?&#8221; Finding the right actors for a role. Shockingly, she likes Bruno and Borat. THREE STARS<br />
<strong>25. Kevin Nealon.</strong> Nealon&#8217;s been wiretapped. Starting as a bartender at comedy clubs. If Kevin Nealon did impressions, he&#8217;d do John Malkovich and John Lithgow. How he got the SNL gig. The madness of SNL. His standup special. His book. Blah blah. Nealon about being on Twitter: &#8220;I&#8217;m always kidding around.&#8221; RE autoasphyxiation: &#8220;If someone broke into my house, and was strangling me anyway, I might try it.&#8221; TWO STARS<br />
<strong>26. Lisa Loeb.</strong> Kev likes Zombieland. Lisa is with child. She has a Camp Lisa CD. All about Liz and Lisa. Kids stuff. The national anthem vs. &#8220;God Bless America.&#8221; Pretty boring. Get some Fage yogurt. Pollak: &#8220;We&#8217;re foodies too.&#8221; The intro of &#8220;Oprah, Miley, Demi.&#8221; Please make it go away. Explaining her recipe Tweets, and how to find them. Talking about how fun it is to sit home and watch TV was the highlight of this ep. You get the idea. Explaining what cale is. You&#8217;re rushing to watch this now, aren&#8217;t you? Worst outfit ever. (Did anyone tell her it&#8217;s a black background?) Keep hearing someone whispering in the background. They must be bored too. She&#8217;s making a line of glasses. Cat cafes in Japan. ONE STAR<br />
<strong>27, part 1. Eddie Izzard.</strong> Kevin loves Canada. Sammy flips off fans. Please stop these guests from wearing black!! Rewatching Chaplin &#8220;in the venue it was designed for.&#8221; Does comedy age? The Edinburgh Festival as a career path. How &#8220;Stomp&#8221; influenced him. Going from being a street performer to a stand-up situation. &#8220;Your confidence keeps building. Eventually the material catches up with your confidence.&#8221; Ancien Regime vs. meritocracy. &#8220;Study the Battle of Austerlitz, if you want a comedy career.&#8221; How getting NY to buy into a &#8220;straight transvestite&#8221; would help the whole rest of the country cave to his brilliance. Eric Idle about Izzard: &#8220;You&#8217;re doing the stand-up version of Python.&#8221; How standup is more respected in Britain. How Brits, Mexicans and aliens would all be classified as &#8220;aliens&#8221; by the US government. A health-care discussion. &#8220;How hard did you have to fight to get rid of slavery?&#8221; On being a transvestite. On doing international standup and learning the languages. Whether God exists. Dissecting Hitler&#8217;s rise. Going from drama to comedy. TV vs. stand-up. On Jack Nicholson&#8217;s progress as an actor. &#8220;Thinks like an American.&#8221; &#8220;In the 1700s, I would&#8217;ve been on that boat.&#8221; Whether or not we landed on the moon. Doing marathons. About Ricky Gervais and Steve Martin. About ending war, starting with the E.U. Seeing the crew in drag. My eyes!!! FOUR STARS</p>
<p><strong>MACBREAK WEEKLY</strong><br />
<strong>88. Drobotized</strong> Leo, Scott, Alex and Andy discuss the technology of the Drobo, how people don&#8217;t recognize how powerful the Drobo is. &#8220;You&#8217;re buying a rack for $500.&#8221; Movin to the cloud. </p>
<p><strong>THE NERDIST</strong><br />
<strong>1. Tom Lennon.</strong> Annoying only because all the nerds keep butting in. ONE STAR cause it&#8217;s the first show.</p>
<p><strong>2. Drew Carey.</strong> Drew talks about his secret life in Second Life. FOUR STARS</p>
<p><strong>3. Adam Carolla.</strong> Adam really really really doesn&#8217;t like Sid and Marty Kroft. He really doesn&#8217;t. THREE STARS</p>
<p><strong>4. Rob Huebel. </strong>Eh. TWO STARS</p>
<p><strong>5. Jon Hamm.</strong> Hear one of the sexiest men on the planet swear like a banshee. Then Jon does too. <img src='http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  FOUR STARS</p>
<p><strong>6. Joel McHale.</strong> Drop into the time machine 50 years, when Chris and Joel are still doing versions of the Soup (Web and straight-up). TWO STARS</p>
<p><strong>7. Andy Richter.</strong> This was taped pretty much right after the Conan debacle, before the new show started. Bitter? Him bitter? Oh, and you learn why Hispanics like Morrissey (according to Richter). Dissecting Lady Gaga. Nose fucking with Andy Richter. How fetishes begin. Richter: &#8220;I don&#8217;t need a hairbrush in my ass.&#8221; Hardwick: &#8220;Kubrickian sex club where people are nose fucking each other.&#8221; Fat stories from the set of &#8220;Arrested Development.&#8221; How Andy and Conan first met. TWO STARS</p>
<p><strong>WTF with Marc Maron</strong></p>
<p>1. Jeff Ross<br />
2. Jim Earl/Matt<br />
3. Patton Oswalt<br />
4. David Feldman<br />
5. John Oliver/<br />
6. David Cross<br />
7. Nick Griffin<br />
8. Caroline Rhea<br />
9. Jim Gaffigan<br />
10. Sam Lipsyte<br />
11. Todd Barry/<br />
12. Nick Kroll<br />
13. Jerry Stahl/<br />
14. Steve Agee/<br />
15. LIVE<br />
16. Eugene Mirm…<br />
17. Listener Email<br />
18. Al Madrigal<br />
19. Jack Boulwa<br />
20. Zach Galifanakis<br />
21. New Mexico&#8230;<br />
22. Doug Stanhope<br />
23. Wyatt Cenac<br />
24. LIVE at UCB<br />
25. Janeane Garafolo<br />
26. Jen Kirkman<br />
27. Jon Benjamin<br />
28. Eddie Brill/<br />
29. Andy Kindler<br />
30. Kyle Kinane<br />
31. Steve Ranna<br />
32. Todd Glass/<br />
33. Sarah Silverman<br />
34. Dana DeArmond<br />
35. Dave Pullano<br />
36. Howard Kremer<br />
37. Bill Burr<br />
38. Matt Braugher<br />
39. Chelsea Peretti<br />
40. Dave Attell<br />
41. Jimmy Pardo<br />
42. Seattle Roadtrip<br />
43. Antonia Cran&#8230;<br />
44. John Caparulo<br />
45. Matt Walsh/<br />
46. W. Kamau Bell/<br />
47. Margaret Cho<br />
48. Brendon Small<br />
49. Kumail Nanji<br />
50. LIVE: Ladies Night from UCB<br />
51. Glenn Wool<br />
52. James Wolcott<br />
53. All-Star Super&#8230;<br />
54. Vegas/Ron&#8230;<br />
55. Rob Delaney<br />
56. Scotland/Do&#8230;<br />
57. Jon Dore/Gr…<br />
58. El Chupacabra/<br />
59. Robert Hawkins<br />
60. Bob Odenkirk<br />
61. Dave Hill<br />
62. Myq Kaplan/<br />
63. Jim Short/<br />
64. Road Trip with Eddie<br />
65. Scott Aukerman<br />
66. Brendon Burns<br />
67. Robin Williams<br />
68. Steven Pearl<br />
69. LIVE in Portland<br />
70. Dave Anthony<br />
71. David Wain/<br />
72. Maria Bamford<br />
73. Jim Norton<br />
74. Tracy McMilan<br />
75. Carlos Mencia**<br />
76. Willie Barcen&#8230;<br />
77. Moshe Kash&#8230;<br />
78. Dylan Brody<br />
79. Ben Stiller<br />
80. Ireland<br />
81. Tig Notaro<br />
82. The Sklar Brothers<br />
83. Jim Jeffries<br />
84. Marga Gomez<br />
85. Dane Cook/<br />
86. Bring the Rock<br />
87. Daniel Handler<br />
88. Nick Swardson<br />
89. Andy Richter<br />
90. Joe Wagner/<br />
91. Matt Besser/<br />
92. Paul Provenza<br />
93. Dana Gould<br />
94. Mike Birbiglia*<br />
95. Patrice O&#8217;Neal<br />
96. Judah Friedlander<br />
97. Moshe Kasher<br />
98. Stewart Lee<br />
99. London<br />
100. Episode 100<br />
101. Natasha Legero&#8230;<br />
102. Jimmy Pardo<br />
103. Judd Apatow, part 1**<br />
104. Judd Apatow, part 2**<br />
105. Thomas Lennon<br />
106. Whitney Cummings<br />
107. Patton Oswalt<br />
108. Jesse Thorn<br />
109. Bob Saget</p>
<p>You can get previous episodes if you get his iTunes app and buy them (sorta). You can also buy live eps at his store. I like the live eps WAY less, for the record. But for those who want COMEDY from a comedy podcast, these are the way to go.</p>
<p><strong>110. LIVE</strong> David Cross, Michael Showalter, et al. Eh.</p>
<p><strong>Remembrance: Robert Schimmel and Greg Giraldo</strong>  So sad, but so poignant. A remembrance by a friend. Beautifully done. FOUR STARS</p>
<p><strong>111. Louis CK, part 1.</strong> Louis talks about his early days, and gets emotional at the birth of his daughter. Poignant and real. A keeper. FOUR STARS</p>
<p><strong>112. Louis CK, part 2.</strong> Friends talk, friends make up, friends vow to keep in touch. And Louis CK talks about his current projects. And the reason he writes, edits, acts, directs them. FOUR STARS</p>
<p><strong>113. Ray Romano and Mike Royce.</strong> The interesting thing to me about this ep is what you can do on cable that you can&#8217;t do on network TV. How gambling is a current in Romano&#8217;s life that is now reflected in his Men of a Certain Age character. THREE STARS</p>
<p><strong>114. Jonathan Ames</strong> Novelist who talks about some Spaulding Gray revelations. Wrestling with a Mangina. The most emotionally detached guest so far. Ames: &#8220;I wanna hide. I don&#8217;t wanna put myself out there anymore.&#8221; He writes for Bored to Death. Ames: &#8220;We&#8217;re middle class clowns with the luxury of trying to figure their brains out.&#8221; Ames: &#8220;I tend to be more oral.&#8221; God bless the men who love cunnilingus. Some boxing stuff. Ames: &#8220;That is our job. To make people laugh, to feel a little less alone.&#8221; Some talk about Bored to Death. Ames: &#8220;People don&#8217;t really pay attention too much to other people.&#8221; TWO STARS</p>
<p><strong>115. LIVE</strong> at the Vancouver Comedy Fest. Racist comedy. Oh fun. A deep discussion of the &#8220;N&#8221; word. Giving someone pudding. Unrated.</p>
<p><strong>116. Sarah Silverman</strong> Marc is in Dallas. He marvels at the &#8220;Texas fat.&#8221; &#8220;Death of a Salesman&#8221; according to Maron. The plethora of Christian radio in Texas. He ponders what George W. Bush is doing right now. Maybe dropping by? There are pineapples on the comforter. Talking with Sarah Silverman from her Beverly Hills apartment. &#8220;I&#8217;m not for everyone.&#8221; On doing commercials. &#8220;I&#8217;m hated more than loved.&#8221; They look at her book, that Marc is in. How Sarah&#8217;s dad looks a lot like some of her boyfriends. &#8220;Fuck the comedian until you get funny.&#8221; Whether or not she was the defining moment in Dave Atell&#8217;s career. About her show cancellation. Sarah&#8217;s rabbi sister. Sarah&#8217;s never been to Israel. &#8220;I&#8217;d rather watch Law and Order at home.&#8221; About whether or not they want to have kids. &#8220;Get kids at the shelter. There&#8217;s way more kids at the shelter than dogs.&#8221; About letting a joke evolve over a year. &#8220;Book people are buffoons, just like Hollywood.&#8221; &#8220;Remember when we had a band? Me, you, Todd and Louie? For like a day?&#8221; TWO STARS </p>
<p><strong>117. Ira Glass</strong> Originally scheduled to be a doctor, Ira Glass found NPR and radio. Yet, he marvels at Marc&#8217;s ability to be emotionally honest on the mic, as much as Marc marvels at Ira&#8217;s &#8220;singular voice.&#8221; Marc talks about how talking into a mic allows one to be more honest than on a stand-up stage. MM: &#8220;A lot of my struggles (on mic) is me becoming a better person. It&#8217;s an experiment in humility.&#8221; Ira: &#8220;A story is always an answer to the question, &#8216;How should I live my life?&#8217; …And that&#8217;s the structure of the podcast.&#8221; MM: &#8220;By my natural intensity, (I frighten people).&#8221; Ira: &#8220;Some stories are not inherently interesting.&#8221; Marc&#8217;s &#8220;This American Life&#8221; story. Ira: &#8220;Most radio stories work best, if where they lead you to is some thought you have about the world.&#8221; On being self-involved. MM: &#8220;When we are talking to another individual, if we are listening, we are not self-involved.&#8221; FOUR STARS </p>
<p>***********************************</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/10/podcast-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survivor Has Found God&#8230; and Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/survivor-has-found-god-and-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/survivor-has-found-god-and-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Probst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ozzy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survivor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people talk these days about reality TV, the images of Snooki making out with a girl (both drunk), or loud housewives screaming at each other in restaurants probably come to mind. But quietly, oh so quietly, the show that &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/survivor-has-found-god-and-social-media/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people talk these days about reality TV, the images of Snooki making out with a girl (both drunk), or loud housewives screaming at each other in restaurants probably come to mind. But quietly, oh so quietly, the show that started it all is taking this whole concept in another direction.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s for a minute revisit the old direction. Survivor started out eons ago now, with conniving, back-stabbing Richard Hatch winning its first season (you remember him, he later ended up in jail for tax evasion). Throughout its seasons, it has pretty much been thus, too. Lying, cheating, backstabbing, blindsiding people who trust you. That&#8217;s how you win.</p>
<p>But its strength, right from that very first episode, has been in listening. In letting people do what they do, and letting things happen. That first outburst by Sue at Tribal Council still gives me chills if I think about it. People are funny, and people will surprise you.</p>
<p>That is really what has kept Survivor at the top of its game all these years, and is, frankly, why Jeff Probst keeps scooping up those Emmys every year (well-deserved). They let people do their thing and they capture it on camera.</p>
<p>But something really significant happened last season. While there had been many backstabbing moments captured on film, this was different. These last couple of seasons of Survivor have added a new wrinkle called Redemption Island. Where you aren&#8217;t voted out immediately, you kind of go to a holding area, to fight one last battle for your survival.</p>
<p>The brilliant thing about this new thing is that the Survivors who get sent there are pretty much removed from all the pre-planned and produced hoopla going on with the others. They are pretty much on their own, for days or weeks sometimes.</p>
<p>Matt was the contestant who changed the path of Survivor. You see, Matt believed in God. Strongly. And you&#8217;d see him on Redemption Island, getting spiritual, connecting with God, then winning all these challenges. Survivor producers may not have originally planned it that way, but it turned out to be great TV.</p>
<p>Sometimes competitors would get to hang out for a bit, before they had to do battle. Such a thing happened with Matt and an opponent from the opposite team. They were on opposing teams on Survivor, but in the team of religion, they were on the same side. They shared Bible verses with each other, and prayed before their battle. </p>
<p>And here was the moment, as stunning a Survivor moment as that first outburst by Sue when she described Richard as a rat. One competitor on Redemption Island lost. Matt was left behind to fight another later. As the competitor left, he turned and gave his Bible to Matt. &#8220;You need it more than me right now,&#8221; he said. It was stunning, heart-wrenching. Poignant. Real.</p>
<p>Ratings gold.</p>
<p>And also, brought up a whole new question, one which had been bounced around, in some contestants here or there through the seasons, but usually played down. What if there was a different kind of Survivor? What if you picked people who had a very strong faith, of whatever kind? People who might play Survivor with integrity instead of the old, played-out backstabbing mold? What if you quietly, but surely, looked at the various contestants to see how they make it through their days? What types of prayers do they share? When do they call on God, and how?</p>
<p>And most importantly, is the structure of Survivor such that you cannot win without cheating, lying and back-stabbing? It is, after all these seasons, a thrilling question. A compelling spin on an old game.</p>
<p>We are two episodes into this new season of Survivor: South Pacific. Another recent new wrinkle: contestants from past seasons are brought back. Last season, two &#8220;villains&#8221; returned: Rob Mariano (who ended up winning) and Russell Hantz (possibly the most hated and evil manipulative player ever). This season, a new direction. The two brought back were known for their spirituality.</p>
<p>Cheerful loving Ozzy, and &#8220;Coach,&#8221; who was primarily known for meditating and doing yoga on the beach. Right out of the gate, both are molding their teams, not through sneaky manipulation (lying to this one or that), but by trying to function through integrity. Being truthful to their tribemates.</p>
<p>In a really bizarre wrinkle (it&#8217;s almost like a parallel-universe Survivor), evil Russell Hantz&#8217;s nephew is on the show. Except, he&#8217;s the exact opposite. He quotes Bible verse, and gets so troubled when he tells a lie that he has to blurt out the truth, sometimes at very inopportune moments. He is physically struggling with lust in Ep. 2. He endeavors to get the object of his lust booted out, since &#8220;I&#8217;m a married man. I can&#8217;t have her around.&#8221; It&#8217;s fascinating.</p>
<p>There are hints that in the next episode, he&#8217;s struggling with the good and bad sides of his nature.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not just these three. Ozzy, whom contestant Dawn had called &#8220;Bob Marley&#8221; just a bit earlier for his free spirit, calms Dawn down when she freaks out a bit, after realizing the tough conditions of actual Survivor. Jeff Probst (whom I take for a very spiritual man himself) always says that Survivor will &#8220;kick your ass.&#8221; Sometimes it takes awhile to see this, as contestants get emaciated and pass out, or quit. Sometimes it shows up right away.</p>
<p>Dawn, whom I love, cause I can relate to her so much, seems very tightly wound. Very much in control in her normal life. Suddenly in an out-of-control situation. You can imagine. But there, in a deeply spiritual moment, Ozzy the veteran, stops what he&#8217;s doing, to counsel Dawn. Tells her (what is obvious to us) that she&#8217;s &#8220;got what it takes.&#8221; (I think she&#8217;s got what it takes to win, too.)</p>
<p>And really, the truth of Survivor always has been that you have to push yourself to limits you didn&#8217;t know you could get through. There was a moment last season, where two tough talking chickies pulled all sorts of shenanigans, but one week of solid rain brought them to their knees. They both quit.</p>
<p>Since then, new rules have been put into place about the whole quitting thing. It was a Survivor disgrace. To say nothing of the thievery and pushing down people with one leg. It got very nasty. Maybe this is a karmic way for Survivor to get its good mojo back.</p>
<p>Other cast members have their own methods of religion or connection with the Universe. One calls upon her Native American roots, and prays to their gods. Another, a gay policeman, talks about how now he &#8220;has nothing to lose.&#8221; Each, in their own way, seems to be on a spiritual quest of some kind.</p>
<p>Of course, TV is about conflict, so amidst all these do-gooders, you have to have some evil. We have a poker playing pot seller (medical), a scheming selfish shrewish woman (who&#8217;s already been voted out), and maybe a couple of others. But it really looks like this season, the good guys are going to win. Or at least those connected to God. You really should watch.</p>
<p>********************</p>
<p>In other Survivor news, host Jeff Probst continues to push the envelope with social media. Last season, he simultaneously Tweeted to first the East Coast, then the West Coast, as each&#8217;s episode aired. It was wonderful. So far this time, he is only Tweeting for one show, but he&#8217;s also adding an element called &#8220;Tout,&#8221; where he can post video segments (answering fan questions during the commercials). It is the most effective use of social media from any show I&#8217;ve seen on TV. Great way to get the fans involved&#8211;and watching in real time.</p>
<p>All great reasons to tune in to Survivor: South Pacific. It&#8217;s going to be a good season, God told me so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/survivor-has-found-god-and-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emmys 2011: Some thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/emmys-2011-some-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/emmys-2011-some-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emmys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Always]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[can't lose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear eyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emmy 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full hearts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Katims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Bowen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Chandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margo Martindale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Scorcese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Dinklage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ty Burrell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kyle Chandler. That&#8217;s all I keep thinking about when I remember last night&#8217;s Emmys. The good guys finally won. Our full hearts and clear eyes finally found some Emmy voters who agreed with not only Kyle Chandler as Best Actor &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/emmys-2011-some-thoughts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle Chandler. That&#8217;s all I keep thinking about when I remember last night&#8217;s Emmys. The good guys finally won. Our full hearts and clear eyes finally found some Emmy voters who agreed with not only Kyle Chandler as Best Actor in a Drama, but also the series finale, &#8220;Always&#8221; as Best Writing in a Drama.</p>
<p>That image, of Kyle Chandler (truly not expecting to win), and the favorite, Jon Hamm truly looking stunned he didn&#8217;t, keeps staying with me.</p>
<p>That, and the Best Actress in a Comedy beauty contest pageant lineup (dreamed up by Amy Poehler and Martha Plimpton) that ended up with long-overdue winner (for Gilmore Girls, not just Mike &#038; Molly) Melissa McCarthy ending up with a tiara on her head, and roses in her hands, in addition to an Emmy.</p>
<p>Melissa McCarthy with a tiara. Kyle Chandler, nearly speechless. The good guys winning. That&#8217;s what this Emmys brought. </p>
<p>Many of my predictions (Peter Dinklage for Game of Thrones Best Supporting Actor, Drama; Julianna Margulies for Best Actress, Drama; Ty Burrell for Best Supporting Actor, Comedy) seemed easy to me, and came true (I had a 16-9 record). But it was the ones I thought were too good to actually happen that did.</p>
<p>Kyle Chandler, Melissa McCarthy. I had actually predicted &#8220;Always&#8221; to win Writing, but I thought it too sweet, too perfect to happen. Like Martin Scorcese, winning for Direction in Drama for Boardwalk Empire. It seemed like it must happen, I predicted it, but it seemed so far outside what everyone else was predicting.</p>
<p>I was wrong about Julie Bowen, though I was right about most of the rest of the Modern Family cavalcade. Both Jane Lynch and Julie Bowen triumphed thru being submitted on their competitors&#8217; tapes this year. I&#8217;m really glad it was Bowen who pulled it out.</p>
<p>And when Peter Dinklage got up there (the common wisdom varied, usually centering on either John Slattery or Josh Charles), taking a statue for the Lannisters, all felt right with the world. So, too, when Margo Martindale (whom I also had predicted) got to the stage. It was like there was a collective &#8220;Awwww&#8221; heard all through Hollywood. Here was a working actress who had been one of those &#8220;jobbers&#8221; who&#8217;s constantly working in series after series, being recognized for what a great actress she actually is.</p>
<p>That was the tenor and the fabric of this year&#8217;s Emmys. No glossy winners who didn&#8217;t deserve it. Jeff Probst had won again at the Creative Arts Emmys last week (so very deserving). The Daily Show, deservedly, collected its stash of trophies. (So very deserving.) Kate Winslet and Guy Pearce, who made Mildred Pierce come alive, picked up theirs. </p>
<p>Stately Downtown Abbey won its share, including for Maggie Smith.</p>
<p>In fact, I can&#8217;t think of one winner where I thought, Oh, that&#8217;s so wrong, that person/show didn&#8217;t deserve it. And, for me, the ones I missed I credit to the fact that I hadn&#8217;t yet watched their tapes (Jim Parsons for Best Actor, Comedy; although everyone else was predicting Steve Carrell, anyway). </p>
<p>Let me speak to that for a moment. People who predict Emmys (for a living, even) often choose based on who is &#8220;due&#8221; or who seems to be hot at the moment. I believe firmly that the driving factor in choice is the tape in front of that Emmy voter, compared against the next tape. Perhaps, if, for example, Martha Plimpton and Melissa McCarthy both had brilliant and funny tapes, and a voter can&#8217;t decide, they will go to &#8220;Oh yeah, she&#8217;s been working in the industry for so long, she deserves it,&#8221; or &#8220;I loved her in Bridesmaids, so I&#8217;m going to pick her.&#8221; Perhaps it works like that. With the tape being 85% of the decision, and all things being equal, other factors being added in after that point.</p>
<p>Others, including big Emmy gurus, predict people like Steve Carrell because of the sentimentality, the picture they&#8217;d like to paint, that &#8220;well, it&#8217;s his last year on The Office,&#8221; of course people are finally going to give it to him.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think that factors in at all. (Or within 10-15%, at most.) I erred in my prognostications this year because I bought into the hype, thinking that Betty White, back together with Mary Tyler Moore in her tape, would be Emmy catnip. </p>
<p>Really, what counted was that in both Jane Lynch&#8217;s case and Julie Bowen&#8217;s case, they were on TWO tapes that Emmy voters watched. And since Lynch won last year, it was a simple choice.</p>
<p>I use these factors to make my Emmy prognostication better next time around.</p>
<p>But until then, go seek out Friday Night Lights, if you haven&#8217;t already. Cause you know: Clear eyes, Full hearts can&#8217;t lose. Congrats to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/09/emmys-2011-some-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updates, updates, we have updates!</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/08/updates-updates-we-have-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/08/updates-updates-we-have-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, it&#8217;s like they let me out of the cage or something! Updating everything. Soon, I will have some TV reviews, some podcast reviews and maybe even some Oscar movie reviews posted. Gimme some time, would ya? (Always seemed strange &#8230; <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/08/updates-updates-we-have-updates/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, it&#8217;s like they let me out of the cage or something! Updating everything.</p>
<p>Soon, I will have some TV reviews, some podcast reviews and maybe even some Oscar movie reviews posted. Gimme some time, would ya?</p>
<p>(Always seemed strange to have a blog about Hollywood, with a picture of NY.) Maybe I&#8217;ll get one of my own pics in there soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/08/updates-updates-we-have-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miche&#8217;s Oscar Tally</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/03/miches-oscar-tally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/03/miches-oscar-tally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 05:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["...correctly picking 20 of 24 races." <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/03/miches-oscar-tally/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miche wins the Awards Daily Oscar contest, correctly picking 20 of 24 races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/03/miches-oscar-tally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent Spirit Awards Tally</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/independent-spirit-awards-tally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/independent-spirit-awards-tally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miche predicted 12 Independent Spirit Awards. She got 11 right. <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/independent-spirit-awards-tally/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her latest episode, MicheBelz Hollywood 112, <strong>Miche predicted 12 Independent Spirit Awards. She got 11 right.</strong></p>
<p>The one she got wrong (calling Tiny Furniture instead of Get Low for Best First Feature) she freely admitted she wasn&#8217;t sure of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/independent-spirit-awards-tally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Somewhere Drives Angst in Circles</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/somewhere-drives-angst-in-circles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/somewhere-drives-angst-in-circles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chateau Marmont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elle Fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost in Translation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marie Antoinette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Coppola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somewhere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Dorff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tokyo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We get it. Everyone is alienated from each other, and boo hoo, celebrities most of all. <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/somewhere-drives-angst-in-circles/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a filmmaker, I have been entranced by Sofia Coppola. &#8220;Lost in Translation&#8221; was one of my favorite movies, not only for the way it captured the beauty of Tokyo, but also for the many ways it indicated people having a hard time communicating with each other. I was even one of the few who enjoyed the decadence of &#8220;Marie Antoinette.&#8221; It seemed to say a lot of things about the French queen and indie music at the same time. Plus, it was also visually stunning.</p>
<p>I should have been forewarned about &#8220;Somewhere.&#8221; The opening shot is someone (unclear who) driving a fancy expensive car, basically in circles. Very fast. For like ten minutes.  I should have walked out at that moment. Cause that pretty much is the movie, right there.</p>
<p>The rest of it is this: Handsome superstar action hero actor bunks up at Hollywood&#8217;s Chateau Marmont, and you see his decadent life. How naked women parade in and out of his life, through the hallways sometimes. They appear to amuse him, dancing nakedly, while he mostly falls asleep. They appear to have sexual trysts with him. Then disappear. It&#8217;s an endless parade.</p>
<p>All of this is well and good, until suddenly his daughter appears to stay with him. Puts a bit of a crimp in his plans. So now he plays Wii and hangs by the pool and orders pizza. And wow. Isn&#8217;t this fun?</p>
<p>Then, they take a jaunt to Venice for a movie premiere where luscious Italian beauties also thrust themselves at him. They hang out at an Italian pool.</p>
<p>He comes back. Some friends come over. They leave.</p>
<p>This is basically the movie. </p>
<p>Oh poor overpaid baby. Have to suffer with Chateau Marmont&#8217;s room service. His daughter gets industrious and actually makes food in his kitchen. (I did enjoy Elle Fanning as his daughter.) Stephen Dorff is the actor. </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m jaded because I see too many people living variations of this in Hollywood, or aspiring to variations of this. Maybe I&#8217;m bored with a movie about nothing. We get it. Everyone is alienated from each other, and boo hoo, celebrities most of all.</p>
<p>The big revelation of the movie, yes, I&#8217;m going to SPOIL it for you now, such as it is: at the end of the movie, he decides to move out of the Chateau Marmont. He drives his car. Somewhere. And leaves it. And starts walking.</p>
<p>I guess supposed to symbolize this man actually taking a stand and doing something with his life. In reality, like the rest of the movie, it just emphasizes how bored and stupid and superfluous his actions are.</p>
<p>Sorry, Sofia, this one bored me to tears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2011/02/somewhere-drives-angst-in-circles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barney is So Self-Indulgent</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/barney-is-so-self-indulgent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/barney-is-so-self-indulgent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barneys Version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dustin Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnie Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mordechai Richtler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Giamatti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosamund Pike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Speedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[true love]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When suddenly through his drunken stupor, he looks across the room and sees her. Not his freshly-minted wife. His true love. And it hits him like an oncoming train. <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/barney-is-so-self-indulgent/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first half hour of &#8220;Barney&#8217;s Version,&#8221; I wanted to walk out. I found it extremely unfunny, irritating, obnoxious and a waste of my time. Part of the problem for this is that the descriptions of this movie fall in the nebulous category, where publicists don&#8217;t know what the heck to write about it. &#8220;Barney&#8217;s cranky, and this is his life,&#8221; is about as far as they&#8217;d get.</p>
<p>And indeed, there&#8217;s Paul Giamatti, irrascible, puffing cigars and drinking booze from the first frame. Making crank calls to his ex-wife at 3 am. Fun stuff. Why the HELL do I want to get involved in this schmuck&#8217;s life, one asks?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why. To me, it&#8217;s the story of TRUE LOVE. How true love hits someone and doesn&#8217;t let go. And how, even when you have true love, you might just mess it up. That&#8217;s what makes it worth seeing.</p>
<p>Barney&#8217;s first marriage happens when his bride becomes pregnant. He does the honorable thing, and marries her. Then finds out it wasn&#8217;t even his kid. That one doesn&#8217;t end so well.</p>
<p>His dad (Dustin Hoffman) sets him up with his next lovely lady. And Minnie Driver is indeed lovely. And rich. What&#8217;s not to like? Well, the incessant talking, perhaps&#8230; </p>
<p>So, there he is, at his second wedding, surrounded by many of her relatives, everyone getting smashingly drunk. Barney most of all, pounding back the shots. When suddenly through his drunken stupor, he looks across the room and sees her. Not his freshly-minted wife. His true love. And it hits him like an oncoming train.</p>
<p>He ventures closer and starts talking to her. She sees he is drunk. But they do hit it off. He abruptly leaves his own wedding to chase her to the train heading back to New York. And so it begins.</p>
<p>So there was the reason that made me sit in my seat for the rest of the movie, and be rewarded. How can this schlub of a man find true love with such a beautiful woman? But there it is, clear as day.</p>
<p>The film is based on the writings of Mordecai Richler. The film is dedicated to him.</p>
<p>It is packed with a cast of many stunning acting talents. Scott Speedman, for example, looks like sunshine made real as the charming playboy in Italy.</p>
<p>But the revelation, not surprisingly, since she&#8217;s been the revelation of several movies of late (Made in Dagenham notably this season, and An Education last) is Rosamund Pike. She is gorgeous, refined, wonderful as a counterpoint to Barney.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad and kind of tragic that Barney chose to live his life the way he wanted to: drinking, smoking big cigars and watching hockey games with the boys at the local bar. The love of his life chose to grow and evolve. But it&#8217;s very interesting to see how all these pieces fall into place.</p>
<p>So trust me. The beginning may be annoying, but all in all, Barney&#8217;s Version is a good ride through someone&#8217;s life. I really do wanna see &#8220;Miriam&#8217;s Version&#8221; next, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/barney-is-so-self-indulgent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love and Other Drugs Goes Cold Turkey</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/love-and-other-drugs-goes-cold-turkey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/love-and-other-drugs-goes-cold-turkey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Zwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Gyllenhaal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Other Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Platt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parkinsons disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prozac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salesmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viagra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoloft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's shrill, pouty and annoying. He's still glib, uses sex to get his way. Who cares? <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/love-and-other-drugs-goes-cold-turkey/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid the crush of holiday releases and Oscar hopefuls, there are many many great pictures out right now. &#8220;Love and Other Drugs&#8221; is not one of them. The more I think about it, the more it bugs me.</p>
<p>Jake Gyllenhaal plays a brash handsome manipulator who beds women, uses them, spits them out (the usual). Anne Hathaway plays someone who&#8217;s seen it all. She&#8217;s been on the receiving end of such men, and as such, she&#8217;s hardened, crass, cynical, guarded.</p>
<p>Both of these characters, for reasons described, are annoying and not fun to watch. He&#8217;s thinking of ways to use people (easier, better, faster). She&#8217;s thinking of witty comebacks to cut them down to size. Did I mention that this is not fun? This, despite the fact that both of them get naked a lot. Really. It&#8217;s boring.</p>
<p>Who can he bed to sell his products? How can she avoid commitment? Wackiness ensues. No, not really. Boredom ensues.</p>
<p>SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER </p>
<p>The supposed serious part of this is the increase in pharmacological assistance through depression drugs like Zoloft and Prozac, the salesmen who hawk them, and it all comes complete with a splashy song and dance number. And when Gyllenhaal&#8217;s company (Pfizer) comes out with Viagara&#8230; well, you can imagine what that does to Lothario&#8217;s drug sales.</p>
<p>The wrench in all this is that Hathaway has Parkinson&#8217;s disease (note shaky hand a couple of times). This is why she knows all the drug salesmen. And comes the speech: &#8220;You&#8217;re not gonna love me cause I have a disease!&#8221; (*pouts* *stomps feet*) She&#8217;s way too self-deprecating in this movie. Mean to herself and others.</p>
<p>He has received a horror story of the progression of the disease from someone at a conference, so suddenly it&#8217;s &#8220;Nope, I&#8217;m shallow. I don&#8217;t love you. Bye.&#8221;</p>
<p>Blech. At this point, who cares? She&#8217;s shrill, pouty and annoying. He&#8217;s still glib, uses sex to get his way. Who cares?</p>
<p>The fact that anyone anywhere mentions this dreadful movie in the context of Oscars is sad. No one in this movie (though I do love director Edward Zwick and actor Oliver Platt, but seriously&#8230;) deserves anything that has the word Oscar attached to it.</p>
<p>Really hated it. Don&#8217;t waste your time. Many other great movies out there instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/12/love-and-other-drugs-goes-cold-turkey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creative fever dream Swans into Best Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/creative-fever-dream-swans-into-best-picture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/creative-fever-dream-swans-into-best-picture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbra Hershey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Actress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Swan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Aronofsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mila Kunis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swan Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vincent Kassel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Swan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winona Ryder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Nina had to learn, with sex, with dreaming, with life, sometimes you just have to let it flow over you and become part of you. So, too, with "Black Swan."  <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/creative-fever-dream-swans-into-best-picture/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviewers who write about movies for a living, who have to slog through every paint-by-numbers adaptation, seem to have difficulty with two things: spirituality in movies, and the creative process in movies. Mind you, there aren&#8217;t that many movies about either of those two things because they are also ephemeral streaks of lightning to capture in the film bottle.</p>
<p>What I had read about &#8220;Black Swan&#8221; prior to seeing it fluctuated on the spectrum from horror flick to Grand Guignol theatre to thriller to scary movie. In short, I really didn&#8217;t know what to expect. Perhaps it will be one or some of those things to you, too.</p>
<p>How I perceived &#8220;Black Swan&#8221; was more like a dream. The dream, the central focus for this ballerina, is to be perfect. And she studies and she plies and she does everything she thinks she&#8217;s supposed to do. </p>
<p>But when the company leader decides to do &#8220;Swan Lake,&#8221; he presents her with this challenge: &#8220;You&#8217;d be great as the White Swan.&#8221; But, essentially, she doesn&#8217;t have enough of a dark side to do the Black Swan justice. (This lead character in the ballet performs both sides of a complex persona.)</p>
<p>&#8220;Black Swan,&#8221; then, is about this striving-for-perfection ballerina figuring out what it takes to reach her own &#8220;dark side.&#8221; What she discovers is that passion and the thrill of life often lie in its imperfections. As we travel with her on her journey, we also discover what is at the heart of the creative process, how far someone can push themselves for their art.</p>
<p>It is a stunning bravura performance. Prior to seeing the film, I posited on my podcast that Natalie Portman was going to take every award in sight this Oscar season. I think so even moreso after seeing the film. Like Christoph Waltz and Mo&#8217;Nique last year, every other Best Actress contender this year can just sit down. It&#8217;s Natalie Portman&#8217;s year. Her work in this movie is stunning. In fact, I can&#8217;t remember the last time an actress was so stunning and superb and affecting. Brilliant work.</p>
<p>Her supporting cast is also affecting and may glean some supporting nominations: Vincent Cassel as the ballet company director, Barbara Hershey as her mom, Mila Kunis as a fellow dancer. Winona Ryder takes an especially inspired turn, making a droll commentary on her own life, that elicited laughs in our industry screening.</p>
<p>People have also made reference to an &#8220;All About Eve&#8221; subtext. That is only there in as much as fearing other people taking roles you covet is part of the creative process. It&#8217;s really and truly not about that.</p>
<p>In fact, I think where reviewers get into trouble with this role, and even the screening I saw this at, the questioner had the same problem&#8211;is dissecting it too much. Think of it as a dream. Roll around with the images, go with the flights of fancy. True creativity isn&#8217;t that far from the dream state, and true creativity borders on that part of the brain near psychosis too. But don&#8217;t let that analysis hinder you.</p>
<p>As Nina had to learn, with sex, with dreaming, with life, sometimes you just have to let it flow over you and become part of you. So, too, with &#8220;Black Swan.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/creative-fever-dream-swans-into-best-picture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Made in Dagenham: Let&#8217;s hear it for the women!</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/made-in-dagenham-lets-hear-it-for-the-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/made-in-dagenham-lets-hear-it-for-the-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Bragg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dagenham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay for equal work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Made in Dagenham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sally Hawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It made me uncomfortably squeamish, though, to realize that here in America in 2010, women still make only 74% of what men make for the same job. That's why we need those "socialist" unions. I remember now. <a href="http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/made-in-dagenham-lets-hear-it-for-the-women/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, with all the demonizing hate-filled Republican propaganda that fills our airwaves, sometimes one wonders why it is again that unions are relevant. They have been portrayed as terrible things that are ruining our lives. (Just don&#8217;t look at the big corporations that are pulling the strings to make those statements&#8230;)</p>
<p>How far have we gotten from the struggles for the 40-hour week? Or the hard-fought-for half hour lunches and ten-minute breaks, legal by law, yet in this new corporate world where everyone is doing five people&#8217;s jobs, hardly still maintained. Does anyone even remember that it was the unions that fought for these things? For these rights for us working stiffs?</p>
<p>Or has this bad word &#8220;socialism&#8221; (since that other trumped-up bad word, &#8220;communism&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really work anymore, appearing hopelessly dated) really colored everything for so many? So many who voted their corporate keepers back into power, though they decried the influence of the big bad banks? Just makes ya sick, sometimes.</p>
<p>Well, here&#8217;s an antidote to the corporate-cash big money Tea Party election we just stomached. Here&#8217;s a pleasant reminder of exactly what unions can do, and why we need them so, in these crazy times. &#8220;Made in Dagenham&#8221; takes place in England, in the mid-60s. It&#8217;s a true story.</p>
<p>Sallie Hawkins, a sure Oscar contender, is one of the strike leaders. Miranda Richardson has a noble turn herself. (Both were in attendance at the AFI screening.) This film is easily one of my favorites of the year.</p>
<p>Women, working at a Ford plant as machinists, start out the movie wanting to be the same pay grade as men, to be classed as &#8220;skilled,&#8221; rather than &#8220;unskilled.&#8221; Simple enough. Fair enough.</p>
<p>They encounter many obstacles along the way, not the least of which is that they aren&#8217;t taken seriously because they are &#8220;just women,&#8221; after all. We won&#8217;t even talk about the other shop violations which they don&#8217;t even talk about in the movie: the water pouring down on the workplace, the fact that many women work in their bras because it&#8217;s too hot in the shop (those rights are things American workers fought for, and are still enforced).</p>
<p>But the big battle for the women ultimately becomes: &#8220;Equal pay for equal work.&#8221; That is what they fight for. Don&#8217;t wanna spoil the movie. I&#8217;ll just say that it had a positive ending in Britain, and many other countries because of the women of Dagenham.</p>
<p>It made me uncomfortably squeamish, though, to realize that here in America in 2010, women still make only 74% of what men make for the same job. Oh yeah. That&#8217;s why we need those &#8220;socialist&#8221; unions. I remember now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/made-in-dagenham-lets-hear-it-for-the-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The King&#8217;s Speech and Blue Valentine</title>
		<link>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/the-kings-speech-and-blue-valentine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/the-kings-speech-and-blue-valentine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michebel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Valentine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kings Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MicheBelz Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company I work for is responsible for promoting The King&#8217;s Speech and Blue Valentine, so although I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be Oscar contenders, I feel that reviewing them would be a conflict of interest. Sorry, guys.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company I work for is responsible for promoting The King&#8217;s Speech and Blue Valentine, so although I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be Oscar contenders, I feel that reviewing them would be a conflict of interest. Sorry, guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michebelzhollywood.com/2010/11/the-kings-speech-and-blue-valentine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

